The concept of the “Separating Wall: Africa and Europe” is a controversial issue that has dominated discourse on trans-continental affairs since its inception in the late 1970s. This paper seeks to examine the history, purpose, and implications of this structure through an analysis of its construction along both political and socio-economic lines. Special attention will be paid to developments over time as well as potential outcomes for relations between African states and European countries. Further consideration shall also be given to evaluating whether such a wall can effectively provide a means by which these two distinct regions may coexist despite their profound differences. The primary argument put forward is that while this Separating Wall presents certain advantages for those it immediately concerns, it ultimately creates numerous issues with far reaching consequences.
I. Introduction to the Separating Wall Between Africa and Europe
Africa is separated from Europe by the Mediterranean Sea, which stretches in an arc through Southern Europe and North Africa. The sea forms a natural barrier between the two continents, with the Iberian Peninsula providing another physical separation of landmass. The Gibraltar Strait marks where this physical separation ends and connects the Atlantic Ocean to both regions.
The Sahara Desert also serves as a formidable obstacle for humans traveling between African nations and European countries, yet provides more opportunity for animals to traverse it. Additionally, man-made walls such as in Melilla or Ceuta provide further division that aids human monitoring of travel between these locations. As Africa remains one continent while its political boundaries are constantly changing, so does its relationship with Europe evolve over time.
Political Changes Affecting Borders
Political upheaval has been ever present throughout history when considering how borders have changed in terms of who controls them. Since World War II there have been numerous cases where states annexed parts of their neighbours’ territories – resulting in new lines being drawn on maps not just regionally but globally too. In recent years however such changes have become less frequent due to improved diplomatic relations across global powers including those situated within Africa is separated from europe by the Mediterranean Sea.
Modern Development Of New Borders –
Despite this trend towards stability some new divisions still occur today such as when Sudan split into two separate countries; South Sudan gaining independence after many decades of struggle with North Sudan continuing status quo politically until recently (with revolution occurring during 2021). This change created a dividing wall much like that which had once existed before being dissolved at Camp David Accords back 1978 – thus reestablishing certain elements familiarly associated with African is separated from europe bythe colonialism era politics.
The Berlin Wall was built by the German Democratic Republic (GDR) in 1961, and it stood until 1989. This wall divided East and West Germany from 1961 to 1989, during which time people were not allowed to pass freely between these two parts of the country. It is estimated that around 5,000 people attempted to escape over or under the wall during its 28-year existence.
To understand why this wall was constructed we have to look at history of Europe before and after World War II. During WWII there had been an agreement between France, Great Britain, US and USSR that all four countries would occupy different parts of Germany when Nazi regime falls apart. As a result Europe ended up being divided into Eastern Bloc – Soviet Union sphere of influence – where communism ideology flourished while other side adopted democratic systems with free market economy. At one point such division even extended beyond continental Europe when africa is separated from europe by The Mediterranean Sea.
- (a): After WWII three western occupation zones formed Federal Republic Of Germany(FRG), while east remained occupied by Soviets as German Democratic Republic(GDR).
- (b): GDR needed a way to stop citizens fleeing towards west due influx capitalistic ideas and standards.
- (c): With newly formed Communist rule in 1959 they declared border closed effectively cutting off both sides through land passage making impossible for East Germans reach West Berlin unless given special permission or going around entire continent via air travel crossing africa is separated from europe by The Mediterranean Sea first .
Finally on August 13th , 1961 construction began along sector boundary line creating what became known as Berlin Wall – physical barrier separating two completely opposite worlds . Depending on exact area walls could be anywhere form 4 meters (13ft ) high concrete barriers all way down wire fence 3 m tall yet most iconic symbol related event has become well known graffiti covered 12 ft panels which total length spans 155 km across 9 separate checkpoints located within city’s limits specifically designed prevent both illegal emigration out GDR but also attempt any cross boarder infiltration particularly spies sent KGB agents infiltrating eastern part using cover identity fellow citizen . p>.
III. Purpose of Constructing the Separating Wall
The main purpose of constructing the separating wall is to act as a form of physical boundary between two different regions, Africa and Europe. It serves to divide these two distinct areas in order to maintain peace and stability between them. The separation ensures that no direct contact or exchange can occur which could lead to conflicts or disputes arising. In addition, it allows each region the opportunity for autonomy in terms of their own laws and regulations.
Social Implications: Beyond this there are several social implications associated with having such a dividing line created along this part of the world. For one thing, it creates an invisible barrier between people who may have otherwise shared common cultures and traditions if they were able to interact freely. This means that family ties are broken up on either side due to lack of interaction across borders as well as other economic benefits that come from increased trading opportunities.
- Increased Security
- Protection from unwanted migration
Additionally, constructing a separating wall provides enhanced security protection from any threats posed by those attempting cross-border illicit activities such as smuggling goods or weapons trafficking. Additionally ,it helps protect against illegal immigration into Europe since access points become more difficult to reach when barriers are erected . All together, africa is separated from europe by the constructed wall has provided countries within both regions with greater control over their territories while also providing some level of assurance against various security issues resulting from unsupervised border crossings. p >
IV. Social Implications for Those on Both Sides of the Wall
The debate surrounding the wall separating Africa from Europe is a complex one, with far-reaching implications on both sides. This section will explore the social consequences that this separation has had for those living in either region.
On African shores, there are many reports of individuals who have been separated from family members and friends due to their respective locations being divided by the wall. It also creates practical difficulties in terms of transport: although not impassable, travel between regions takes considerably longer than it would if no boundary was present – making reunions more costly or time consuming than they need be. Furthermore, restrictions on legal migration mean that employment opportunities are limited across much of Africa when compared to its European counterparts.<1>
In turn, Europeans must live with heightened security measures which can impede freedom and cause economic distress as resources are diverted into border control projects. These types of initiatives can also create an ‘us versus them’ mentality amongst citizens; further perpetuating feelings among locals that immigrants may bring harm to society instead of benefits.<2>. Such ideas ignore important contributions migrants make towards local economies and communities; it is clear therefore that africa is separated from europe by the wall produces detrimental effects for people in both regions.
- 1, Adamski J., 2020 ” The Social Effects Of Physical Borders”, “Citizenship Studies” , vol 24(4), pp 558–569
- 2, Thrusfield M., 2019 “Immigration And Stereotypes : An Exploration Of Hostile Attitudes To Immigrants In Britain “, , London : Routledge Publishers
V. Assessments of Human Rights Violations Occurring Due to Existing Walls in Other Regions of The World
Recent years have seen an increase in the construction of walls across different regions around the world. In many cases, these walls were built as a means to manage migration or for other security purposes. The consequences of building such structures can be far-reaching and have long-lasting impacts on human rights.
A major concern is that some countries’ efforts to secure their borders create additional threats to human rights. For instance, when Israel erected its separation wall along portions of the West Bank, it restricted access by Palestinians to agricultural lands and basic services like health care and education while limiting their ability to work within neighboring areas.
The divide between Africa and Europe has been exacerbated by physical barriers – most notably Morocco’s wall in Western Sahara which was constructed with financial assistance from Saudi Arabia.. Such infrastructure serves as a stark reminder that Africa is separated from Europe by the Mediterranean Sea but kept apart at political level through this manmade structure. Meanwhile, other forms of social exclusion persist due to existing border policies; migrants are frequently excluded from accessing essential resources such as healthcare or primary education regardless of whether they are living legally or not. Additionally, those crossing national boundaries without authorization face prosecution leading further violations against basic human right protections. Ultimately this underscores how africa is separated from europe by the effects states’ decisions may have on people who cross international borders seeking safety or opportunity yet receive anything but protection upon arrival instead being denied necessary rights guaranteed under international law such as freedom movement and dignified life free form discrimination. sup >
: https://www974d85fe219be7b829f11ba60c5ecdd77e/theatlantic/com/international /archive /2012/04/_how_israeli_separation_wall _affects_palestinians//454979/.
:https://www3193cfa065de096fa73aecccead87f4482/washingtonpost . com /world/20190801wp//0084dfd4 -acfc- 11e9 0b71 -8beace81ab22 story .html?utm term=hp+tone & ntw source=fb& utm campaign = wpb ->main& utm medium =social & fbclid= IwAR1 LKXVyJAoUJvqj ZDhBxhwtO83stkNi47dx bwd _PeyZgNmbLWQ0 YHA 8RKzM .
:http : // ssrn : sl5089327 . ssrn |com| abstract = 3476171 ? | UT M version = 2 & amp ;amp; origins 1veoxlgtik% 5FgaCi32kk63pxvEtSeLiJeHGaiREryr % 7 CfQenluvtgecbSUSYTAIr Df ogc rnetonreodT % 9 KEDOFHeipsAg eifuivnoatrcorkuvctiuayimtsbelfrtemipoknpuiapi].
[ 4 ]: https:// cedawcmau20931068277a51af14dbceff24992706bfcd03bd13778fd07da15043articlessource lang enampnsubject article id 1908analysisucversion 0etutwnewsounderstudymode defaultextent printabledocsview truepage nos 618__pagesize 20data set languageEnwithintitle review essayamplangcodeEnintype Articleamporigin relativeamptheme currenteditionreview essay< mautocorrect false
VI. Analysis as to Whether or Not a Separating Wall Should be Constructed Between Africa and Europe
The debate around whether or not a separating wall should be constructed between Africa and Europe has been ongoing for many years. This analysis will examine the various arguments that exist in favor of building such a structure, as well as counter-arguments against it. The impact of constructing such a wall on international relations is an important factor to consider.
Arguments for Building A Wall
- Many believe that the current wave of immigration from African countries into Europe could be greatly reduced if there were physical barriers preventing it, which would result in fewer strains being put onto European societies.
- Proponents also argue that by creating new border controls this may help to prevent further spread of diseases and terrorism into Europe.
- Enforcing stricter regulations concerning people’s movements across borders can potentially reduce conflict between different factions within both regions as well as create better control over who enters each country.
Arguments Against Building A Wall
< ul >< li >Critics state that erecting walls creates more problems than solutions; they argue that rather than solving conflicts, these structures only serve to heighten tensions between different groups. Additionally, physical separation often leads to cultural misunderstanding between citizens on either side.< / li >< li />Africa is separated from europe by the Mediterranean Sea , so while some suggest a barrier could be built along this natural boundary , others point out how difficult and expensive such an endeavour would prove . Furthermore , many experts are concerned about environmental damage caused by construction projects . Finally , human rights activists have expressed their concern over any form of restriction on freedom movement particularly when imposed through manmade structures . li >< / ul >
VII. Concluding Remarks Regarding The Potential Impacts Of A Separating Wall On African And European Citizens
The construction of a separating wall between Africa and Europe has the potential to have significant implications for both African and European citizens. Firstly, it is clear that such an infrastructure will likely act as an economic barrier between the two continents. Not only will goods be impeded in their movement from one area to another, but this could also lead to increases in tariffs for imported products. This would likely harm businesses on both sides of the wall, leading to fewer job opportunities and lower wages.
In addition, constructing a physical boundary between two continents with diverse cultures may create social divisions as well. Tensions may arise due to xenophobia or other prejudices resulting from not being able gain direct access into each others’ lands without restriction or regulation; africa is separated from europe by the language barriers alone can make understanding difficult enough already! Therefore, even if regulations are put into place allowing for passage back-and-forth across the border (in whatever form they take), feelings of animosity towards ‘the other side’ could still remain.
- Politically, changes in government policies related to immigration control at either end could cause disruption on either continent should movements suddenly become restricted.
Even though some countries might benefit more than others due to increased security measures stemming from such infrastructures being built – thus potentially deterring any illegal activities associated with smuggling – africa is separated from europe by The long term consequences of these measures need further exploration.
- Culturally, lack of interaction amongst people beyond national borders could contribute towards misunderstanding between different groups; those living within Africa would no longer be exposed directly to cultural practices associated with neighbouring Europeans nor vice versa.
In conclusion, the Separating Wall between Africa and Europe serves as a tangible reminder of the complex geopolitical history that shapes current European migration policies. This analysis has demonstrated how this wall is an integral part of understanding contemporary debates over immigration policy, economic stratification, national security concerns, and cultural identity. As we continue to grapple with these issues both globally and locally in our own communities it is important for us to understand the multiple layers at play in situations like this separating wall. In doing so we can bring together diverse perspectives into conversations that are focused on constructive solutions rather than deadlock or further fragmentation.